Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Trinity Pave Diamond Pink

already have some photos that our young students of Colegio San Agustín de Linares (Jaén), taken from last year to complement the subject of language. In this case, correct the name of a street, for everyone knows that in rare Sometimes the consistory of the locations you are introduced to the plates tildes naming these routes. Thanks guys! Lost Accents

farewell to his followers until after the three kings. We're going to take a break until the new year. So Merry Christmas to all!

Monthly Anniversary Text Messages

orphan Street POINT AND OFTEN

Accents Lost Spain has received the award "best blog of the day 'by Stultifer. This is a blog overloaded with stories about, under, front, rear ... of stairs. Stories with which we want to convey that "those who are up or down they go." We turn to translate the message so nicely that have sent us:

"We were taking a walk and found your blog. After careful study, STULTIFER gives you the prestigious award for BEST BLOG OF THE DAY corresponding to Thursday, 9 December 2010 not without my camera for the content and nuances. Visit us and discuss with us. Best Regards from Malaga.
Come on, we liked it and we wanted to approach you. It forms part of the Order of the Golden Stultifer. "

Thank you, we are honored by your distinction. And to all our readers: if you take photos of a staircase, send them to edusiete@gmail.com and making up a story published.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Wedding Invitation Kits Michaels

GREEN SOLUTIONS, FALSE SOLUTIONS

GREEN SOLUTIONS, FALSE SOLUTIONS

A large space has been created in Cancun, during the climate summit, COP-16: the very entrepreneurial Green Solutions has enjoyed great support and presenting advertising proposals vibrant green capitalism aims to bring green technology that can solve all environmental problems that we suffer, from the energy saving light bulbs to hybrid cars and buses or hydrogen. Environmentalists alibis for all types of businesses. Technologies that are ultimately more polluting than the existing. A collection of false solutions that impress those who do not have their feet on the ground.

MEGAPROJECTS, MEGAPROBLEMAS

Megaprojects in the workshop coordinated by the Klimaforum10 eCommunity, we analyze the destructive impact of megaprojects, from its conception to its strategic operating, after one generation, 20-30 years after its opening, from their social and environmental effects deleterious to their harmful effects on justice, democracy and culture, established a short list of mega projects ranging from the roads until dams and oil extraction or mining. Megaprojects as a manifestation of the forces of globalization or as a higher form of destruction of the social fabric of the commons, too, as a utopia of big business and politicians. Major environmental organizations, neighborhood or regional born and strengthened in the world, the proliferation of mega projects in all continents. It is urgent to remove the social imaginary supports mega-projects, created by universities and political marketing.

technoscience is a cult which paralyzes SOCIETY AND YOU JUST CAN PROPOSE SOLUTIONS FALSE

Today science has become technoscience that is: a science born of a great technological apparatus ever greater dimensions at the service of big capital, to the point that science is only what you can get funding. One of two scientists involved in military affairs in the U.S.. In addition, this techno has become a cult which paralyzes society with their "miracles" and their "visions" of the future. Scientific utopias or dystopias, properly describe trips to other planets, lifeless environments, extreme manipulations of matter and of ecosystems. The reductionism that dominates scientific thinking prevents developing solutions to the problems of the modern world. However, techno-science has become one of the greatest threats to mankind, the scientific research is becoming increasingly unhinged to the point where its most conspicuous technologies such as nuclear, genetics, nanotechnology, robotics and electronics pose a serious risk the future of humanity and contribute more and more predation of the gifts of nature. Moreover, this techno is completely incapable of offering real solutions to the great problems of humanity, such as climate change or conservation of soil, water and clean air in the world can only proposing false solutions, as it is kidnapped by the economic thought and the utilitarian philosophy. Fortunately, there are scientists and INES group trying to rescue science from its philosophical and political plight .

Miguel Valencia

eCommunity

Ecological Network Autonomous of Mexico Basin

descreces Or Barbarism!

Action immediately in front of the Peak Oil and Climate Change

recent texts

http://red-ecomunidades.blogspot.com/

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Best Warm Weather Cruises In December

Reclaiming the meaning

Gustavo Esteva

La Jornada

Monday December 13, 2010

Cancun was the last call ... and failed. We can still take advantage of the episode if we dare to derive relevant lessons from it: stop asking for the impossible and pretend that we are God.

environmentalists 20 years ago forced the UN to organize the Earth Summit. Gathered in Rio in 1992, 120 heads of state, eight thousand official delegates and a lot of environmentalists and journalists. Tried to capture an image the result: the function of theater went ahead while

the Titanic sank. The conference, as noted by The Ecologist

timely, consolidated the dominant ecological mythology, made visible the vested interests that prevent and alleviate the current woes put the Church in the hands of Luther. "After reaching the summit, every path is down," said Juan Jose Council then, one of the best known Mexican environmentalists. It was a warning and a recount. Environmentalists warned interested in more sensible patterns of life to continue using the emblem that united could bring water to a mill that was no longer hers. And it showed that many policies and measures aimed at caring for the ecology destroyed.

not learned enough. We continue upwards. Kyoto was a timid step in the right direction, but never fully achieved its purpose. There was in Cochabamba, in the People's Summit, very interesting proposals, but Cancun not taken into account and could not overcome the failure of Copenhagen. As pointed out by Via Campesina, would have been preferable to have no agreement whatsoever to get one so bad.

As usual, was done in parallel to the official conference another meeting: the International Forum for Climate Justice, called for hundreds of organizations. His

Cancun Declaration is a document more valuable than rhetorical stream of the conference, but its content is ambiguous. Their slogan, "Change the system, not the planet," puts the nail on the head. The statement lays bare the nature of the formal proposals, locked in the "market environmentalism" and shows how to produce the opposite of what they want. Makes sensible proposals: abandon the development, set limits, focusing on local areas, retrieve valid traditions. All this, however, remains trapped in the prevailing mentality: it still hangs the institutional apparatus and the intellectual and political trap of diagnosis, a carapace that functions as a tombstone of our dreams of transformation.

affirm or deny climate change implies that we know the planet, we know how to react and have the appropriate technical remedies. Pure nonsense.

Pride unbearable.

institutions continue to rely on means act against all experience and focus energy in the wrong place. There are battles to be fought, no doubt. Celebrate, for example, that led to the recently signed agreement Nagoya, in which 193 members of United Nations created a de facto moratorium against geo-engineering projects and adventures and condemned any attempt to manipulate the global thermostat. " But we do not surrender our will to government administrators of capital, which will dedicated to the protection of their privileges.

dominant formulations, epistemologically fragile, leading to paralysis. Although Evos Morales govern the entire planet, could not fix. Even the most majestic governments are in the hands of ordinary mortals, and all are trapped in bureaucratic intricacies and tissues of interest that tie their hands, heads and minds of even the most illustrious.

need to give social and political ground to our hypothesis, to find ourselves down and left into the reality of the necessary transformation. For example:

must not generate waste. More than recycling, we need from plastic packaging refuse to leave the toilet English, a habit harmful to consume 40 percent of available water for domestic use and produces a poisonous cocktail that contaminates everything in its path.

Instead of moving like crazy on polluting vehicles, we recover the car from the leg, foot or bicycle. That is to live differently, in another system, such as eating, drinking, dressing, living ... wisely.

The examples are endless. If formulated in those terms the urgent issues, confront is in our hands, not the global instance will never do what it takes ... and can not be God, even if they intend.

It's time to change the system, not the planet, as stated in Cancun. That depends on us, not him who derive dignity and income. Who out of Cancun, noted Leonardo Boff, were very unhappy with the result, but finally decided to take matters into their hands.

gustavoesteva@gmail.com

Monday, December 13, 2010

How To Reduce D2nt Time

Regain Sense Manufacturing Dissent: Global and Grassroots Movements elite control

Manufacturing Dissent: Global and Grassroots Movements elite control

23 Sep

The World Social Forum and World Economic Forum, NGOs and movements opposed to globalization are controlled by the same forces to which they protest.

Michel Chossudovsky

In English: Luis R. Miranda

The manufacture of consent involves the manipulation and the formation of public opinion. Establishing the conformity and acceptance of authority and social hierarchy. It seeks to comply with the established social order.

Popular movements are controlled by the globalists using their own "leaders" who are driven to the drivers.

The manufacture of consent, is the public presentation of the main narrative of the media, their lies and falsehoods.
Under the illusion of contemporary capitalism, the illusion of democracy must prevail. It is in the interest of corporate elites to accept dissent and protest as a feature of the system insofar as they do not jeopardize the social order. The purpose is not to stifle dissent, but on the contrary, to shape and mold the protest movement, to establish the limits of dissent. To maintain its legitimacy, economic elites favor forms of limited and controlled opposition, to prevent the development of radical forms of protest, which could shake the very foundations and institutions of global capitalism. In other words, "manufacturing dissent" acts as a "safety valve" that protects and supports the New World Order. To be effective, however, the process of "manufacturing dissent" must be carefully regulated and supervised by those who are the subject of the protest movement.

funding of dissent

How has managed to create and maintain the manufacturing process of dissent? Essentially "funding of dissent", that is, by channeling financial resources that are the subject of the protest movement to which they are involved in organizing the protest movement. Co-optation is not limited to the purchase of political favors. Economic elites - who control large foundations - also oversee the financing of numerous non-governmental and civil society, which historically have been involved in the protest movement against the economic and social established. The programs of many NGOs and popular movements are highly dependent on both public and private funds, including the Ford, Rockefeller, McCarthy, among others. The anti-globalization movement opposes Wall Street and oil giant controlled by Rockefeller, and others. However, foundations and charities Rockefeller and others, generously founded progressive anti-capitalist networks and environmentalists (as opposed to big oil) with the ultimate aim of supervising and training its various activities. The mechanisms of "manufacturing dissent" call handling environment, a process subtle pressure and cooptation of individuals within progressive organizations, including anti-war coalitions, environmentalists and anti-globalization movement. Whereas the media "manufactures consent", the complex network of nongovernmental organizations (including alternative media segments) are used by corporate elites to mold and manipulate the movement of protest. Following the deregulation of global financial system in the 1990 and the rapid enrichment of financial institutions, funding through foundations and charitable organizations has exploded. In a bitter irony, part of the profits fraud on Wall Street in recent years have been recycled and given to tax-exempt foundations and charities. These financial windfalls have not only been used to buy politicians, have also been channeled to nongovernmental organizations, research institutes, community centers, religious groups, environmentalists, alternative media, human rights groups, etc. "The dissent made" applies to corporations "left" and "progressive media", funded by NGOs or directly by foundations. The internal goal is "making dissent "and setting the limits" politically correct "opposition. In turn, many NGOs have been infiltrated by informants often on behalf of Western intelligence agencies. On the other hand, a growing segment of the progressive alternative media on the Internet has become dependent on funding from corporate foundations and charities.

Activists staged

popular protest movements are directly controlled by foundations and "charities" that fund their activities.

The aim of the corporate elites has been to fragment the popular movement in a single mosaic. War and globalization are no longer in the forefront of civil society activism. The activity tends to occur gradually. No integration of movements against globalization and anti-war. The economic crisis is not considered as related to the war sponsored by the powerful countries like the U.S. Dissent has been partitioned. Independent movements that seek to tackle different issues (environment, globalization, peace, women's rights, climate change) are generously funded to prevent the emergence of a coherent mass opposition movement. This mosaic was already common in the fight against the G7 summit and the Summit of the Peoples of the 1990's.

Anti-Globalization Movement

anti-globalization summit in Seattle in 1999 seen as a triumph for the anti-globalization movement, "a historic coalition of activists closing the summit the World Trade Organization in Seattle, the spark that ignited a global anti-corporate movement. " Seattle was in fact an important crossroads in the history of mass movement. More than 50,000 people from diverse backgrounds, civil society organizations, human rights, labor unions and environmentalists had gathered in a common search. His goal was to dismantle the neoliberal agenda, including its institutional base. But Seattle also marked an important change. With the emergence of dissent in all sectors of society, the WTO summit in desperate need of symbolic participation of civil society leaders "inside" to give the appearance of being "democratic." While thousands of people converged on Seattle, what happened behind the scenes was a victory for neoliberalism. A handful of civil society organizations that formally opposed the WTO have helped to legitimize the global trade architecture of the WTO. Rather than challenge the WTO as an intergovernmental organization illegal, agreed to a pre-summit dialogue between Western governments and the WTO. "Participants accredited NGOs were invited to mingle in a friendly environment with ambassadors, trade ministers and Wall Street moguls to several official events, including numerous cocktails and receptions. The hidden agenda was to weaken and divide the protest movement and guide the anti-globalization movement in areas that would not jeopardize the interests of the shop. Funded by private foundations (like Ford, Rockefeller, Rockefeller Brothers, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation for Deep Ecology), these "accredited" civil society had been positioned as lobbyists, acting on behalf of the movement officers popular. To be led by prominent activists their hands were tied. Ultimately contributed (unknowingly) to weaken the anti-globalization movement to accept the legitimacy of what is essentially an illegal organization. (The agreement of the Marrakech Summit 1994 that led to the creation of the WTO on January 1, 1995). NGO leaders were fully aware of where the money came from. However, within the U.S. and the European community of NGOs, foundations and charities are considered independent charitable bodies, other companies, namely, the Rockefeller Brothers Foundation, for example, is considered separate and distinct from the Rockefeller family empire of banks and oil companies. With the salaries and operating expenses based on private foundations, became an accepted routine: In a twisted logic, the battle against corporate capitalism has been a fight with funds from tax-exempt foundations against corporate capitalism. The NGOs were caught in a straitjacket, their very existence depends on the foundations. Their activities were monitored closely. In a twisted logic, the nature of activism anti-corporate capitalism was indirectly controlled by corporate capitalists through their independent foundations.

"Rangers Progressive"

In This saga of evolution, business elites whose interests are properly served by the IMF, the World Bank and WTO, founded (through their various foundations and charities) to organizations that are at the forefront of the protest movement against the WTO and financial institutions based in Washington. With the support of funds from foundations, various "watchdogs" were created by non-governmental organizations to monitor the implementation of neoliberal policies, but without raising the broader question of how the twin Bretton Woods institutions and WTO, through its policies have contributed to the impoverishment of millions of people. The Structural Adjustment Programme for Participatory Review Network (SAPRIN) was established by the Development Gap, an agency of USAID and NGOs financed by the World Bank in Washington DC. It is well documented that the imposition of Structural Adjustment Programme of the IMF and World Bank (SAPs) in developing countries constitutes a flagrant interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states on behalf of the creditor institutions. Rather than challenge the legitimacy of the "deadly economic medicine" the IMF and World Bank, SAPRIN organization sought to build a participatory role for NGOs working closely with USAID and the World Bank. The aim was to give a "human face" to the neoliberal policy agenda, rather than reject the framework of the IMF and World Bank: "SAPRIN is the global network of civil society that took its name from the Structural Adjustment Initiative Review Participatory (SAPRI), which was launched with the World Bank and its president, Jim Wolfensohn in 1997. SAPRI is designed as a tripartite exercise to bring together civil society organizations, governments and the World Bank in a joint review of structural adjustment programs (SAPs) and the exploration of new policy options. It is legitimate role "active" civil society in making economic decisions, because it is designed to indicate areas in which changes in economic policies and in the process of economic policy are required. (http://www.saprin.org/overview.htm SAPRIN website, emphasis added)
Similarly, the Trade Centre (formerly WTO Watch), which operates in Geneva is a project of the Institute for Agriculture Trade and Minneapolis (IATP), which is generously funded by Ford, Rockefeller, Charles Stewart Mott, and others.

(
See Table 1).

Source: http://activistcash.com/organization_financials.cfm/o/16-institute-for-agriculture-and-trade-policy

Observatory Trade has the mandate to oversee the World Trade Organization (WTO), the Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA and the proposed Free Trade Area of \u200b\u200bthe Americas (FTAA). (IATP Trade Observatory, accessed September 2010). The Trade Centre is also to obtain data and information, and promote "good governance" and "responsibility." initiatives are never in promotes accountability to the victims of the policies of the WTO or accountability on the part of the protagonists of the neoliberal reforms.

The functions of the Trade Centre is in no way a threat to the WTO. Quite the contrary: the legitimacy of the organizations and trade agreements are not questioned.

The World Economic Forum

The World Economic Forum is composed of elitist academics and various artists such as U2 singer Bono, who is in charge of carrying a false sense of inclusion to the groups "voiceless."

The popular movement has been hijacked. The selection of intellectuals, trade union executives, and leaders of civil society organizations (including Oxfam, Amnesty International, Greenpeace) are usually invited to the World Economic Forum in Davos, where they mix with the world's most powerful ; the economic and political actors. This mix of business elites in the world with "progressives" selected the finger is part of the ritual that creates and maintains the process of "manufacturing dissent." The trick is to select personally selectively civil society leaders, whom "we trust" and integrate them into a "dialogue", cut off from their bases, they feel they are "global citizens" acting on behalf of his fellow work but, make them act in a way that serves the interests of the Establishment and Enterprises: "The participation of NGOs at the annual meeting in Davos is the evidence of the fact that on purpose [is] trying to build a wide range of key stakeholders in society ... in the defining and promoting the global agenda ... We believe that the World Economic Forum provides the business community the ideal setting for collaborative activities with other major actors [NGOs] in the global economy to "improve the state of the world", is the mission of the Forum.
(
World Economic Forum, Press Release January 5, 2001)

The World Economic Forum does not represent the business community in general. It is an elitist meeting: Members are huge global corporations (with a minimum of 5000 million dollars in turnover year). Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are seen as partners "interested parties" as well as a convenient "spokesman of the voiceless are often excluded from decision making." (World Economic Forum - Nongovernmental Organizations, 2010)
"They [the NGOs] played a variety of roles in the association with the Forum to improve the state of the world, including serving as a bridge between business, government and civil society, the political connection responsible to the base, providing practical solutions ... "civil society" associated "with international companies on behalf of the voiceless. " Who is "excluded"? Union executives are also co-opted, to the detriment of the rights of workers. The leaders of the International Federation of Trade Unions (IFTU), the AFL-CIO, the European Trade Union Confederation, the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), among others, are often invited to attend the annual meetings of the World Economic Forum in Davos, as well as regional summits. Also participating in the World Economic Forum's community leaders work to focus on mutually acceptable patterns of behavior for the labor movement. The World Economic Forum ", estimates that Labour's voice is important for the dynamic dialogue on issues of globalization, economic justice, transparency and accountability, and ensure a healthy global financial system. " "The guarantee of a healthy global financial system" driven by fraud and corruption? The issue of worker rights is not mentioned.
(World Economic Forum - The leaders of Labour, 2010).

The World Social Forum: Another World is Possible "

Seattle summit against globalization in 999 laid the foundation for the development of the World Social Forum.

The World Social Forum is one of the biggest hoaxes the movement against global capitalism and globalism elites.

The first World Social Forum meeting held in January 2001 in Porto Alegre, Brazil. This international meeting was attended by tens of thousands of activists based organizations and NGOs. The WSF meeting of NGOs and progressive organizations held concurrently with the Davos World Economic Forum (WEF). The intention was to be the voice of opposition and dissent to the World Economic Forum business leaders and finance ministers. The World Social Forum from the beginning was an initiative of ATTAC France and several Brazilian NGOs: "... In February 2000, Bernard Cassen, director of a French NGO called ATTAC, Oded Grajew, head of an organization of Brazilian businessmen, and Francisco Whitaker, head of an association of NGOs Brazil, met to discuss a proposed "global event of civil society" in March 2000, which formally secured the support of the municipal government of Porto Alegre and the state government of Rio Grande do Sul, both controlled in time by the Brazilian Workers Party (PT) .... A group of French NGOs, including ATTAC, Friends of L'Humanité, and Friends of Le Monde Diplomatique, sponsored an Alternative Social Forum in Paris entitled "A year after Seattle," to prepare an agenda for the protests that took place at the next European Union summit in Nice. Speakers urged that " reorientation of some international institutions like the WTO, IMF, World Bank ... to create a globalization from below "and" building an international movement of citizens, not to destroy the IMF, but redirect their missions. " (For Research Unit of Political Economy, Economics and Politics of the World Social Forum, Global Research,

January 20, 2004) From the beginning, in 2001, the WSF was supported by funding from the Ford Foundation, which is known links with the CIA as far back as the 1950 "The CIA uses philanthropic foundations as the most effective conduit to funnel large sums of money to Agency projects without alerting the recipients to their source. "
(James Petras, the Ford Foundation and the CIA, Global Research, September 18, 2002)

The same procedure financed by donors summit that marked the summits of the 1990s (Summit People) joined the World Social Forum (WSF): "... Other financiers of the FSM (or 'partners', as they are known in the terminology FSM) included the Ford Foundation - suffice it to say here that has always worked in the most close cooperation with the U.S. and Agency Central Intelligence to advance U.S. strategic interests, the Heinrich Boll Foundation, which is controlled by the German Greens Party, a partner in this [2003] the German government and a supporter of the wars in Yugoslavia and Afghanistan ( their leader, Joschka Fischer, is the [former] Minister of Foreign Affairs of Germany), and major funding agencies such as Oxfam (UK), Novib (Netherlands), ActionAid (UK), and so on. Surprisingly, a member of the WSF International Council, reports that "significant funds" received from these agencies "until now did not awaken any meaningful discussion [in FSM bodies] into the possible relationship of dependence that can be generated. "However, he admits that in order to obtain funds from the Ford Foundation, the organizers had to convince the basis that the Workers Party was not involved in the process. "Two points worth noting here. First, it establishes that the founders were able to twist arms and determine the role of different forces in the World Social Forum - which had to be "convinced" of the credentials of those who were involved. Second, if donors are opposed to the participation of domesticated Workers Party, would be even more strongly recognized by the genuinely anti-imperialist forces. It was made or clear as described those who were included and excluded in the second and third meeting of the World Social Forum .... ... The question of funding [WSF] is not even on the WSF Charter of Principles, adopted in June 2001. Marxists, being materialistic, would say that you must look at the material base of the forum to understand their nature. (Do not be a Marxist to understand that "who pays".) However, the WSF does not agree. You can withdraw funds from the imperialist institutions like the Ford Foundation, while fighting against the "domination the world for the globalists and any form of imperialism " (Research Unit for Political Economy, Economics and Politics of World Social Forum, Global Research, January 20, 2004)

Foundation Ford gave basic support for the World Social Forum, indirect contributions through "partner organizations" from the MacArthur Foundation, the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, the Friedrich Ebert Foundation, the W. Foundation Alton Jones, the European Commission, several European governments (including the Labour government of Tony Blair), the Canadian government and a number of UN agencies (including UNESCO, UNICEF, UNDP, ILO and FAO). In addition to the initial core support from the Ford Foundation, many of the organizations of civil society participants receive funding from major foundations and charities. In turn, the U.S. and European NGOs often function as secondary financing agencies funneling money from the Ford and Rockefeller partner organizations in developing countries, including farmers and human rights movements. The International Council (IC) of FSM is composed of representatives of NGOs, trade unions, media alternative, research institutes, many of which are heavily funded by foundations and governments. (See the World Social Forum
). The same union, who are routinely invited to mingle with the CEOs of Wall Street in the World Economic Forum (WSF), including the AFL-CIO, the European Trade Union Confederation and the Canadian Labor Congress (CLC) are also part of the Council WSF International. Among the NGOs funded by major foundations is the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP), which oversees the Trade Centre in Geneva at the International Council of the Forum. Donor Network on Trade and Globalization (FTNG), which has observer status in the WSF International Council plays a key role. While channeling financial assistance to the FSM, also acts as a clearing house for large foundations. The FTNG described as "an alliance of aid dealers committed to building just and sustainable communities around the world." The members of this alliance are the Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers, Heinrich Böll, CS Mott, Merck Family Foundation, the Open Society Institute, Tides, among others. (For a complete list of funding bodies see

financiers FTNG FNTG). FTNG acts as collection agency funds on behalf of the FSM. Curbing Western governments against globalization summits and repress the protest movement. In a bitter irony, subsidies, including the European Union money is used to fund progressive groups (like the WSF) involved in organizing protests against the very governments that fund their activities. "Governments have also been significant funders of protest groups. The European Commission, for example, funded two groups that mobilized large numbers of people to protest at the EU summit in Gothenburg and Nice. THE British National Lottery, which is overseen by the government helped finance a group in the heart of the British contingent. "
(James Harding, against capitalism, FT.com, October 15, 2001)

is a diabolical process: The host government finances official summit and meetings of NGOs active in the counter top. It also funds the operation of riot police, which is mandated against participants of counter tops. The objective of these combined operations, including acts of violence committed by riot police, is to discredit the protest movement and intimidate participants. The overall objective is to transform the counter-summit in a ritual of dissent, which serves to protect the interests of the official summit and the host government. This logic has prevailed in numerous summits since the 1990's. In the 2001 Summit in Quebec City, the funding from the federal government of Canada to NGOs and trade unions are granted under certain conditions. A large segment of the protest movement was effectively excluded from the Peoples' Summit. In turn, the organizers agreed with the provincial and federal authorities that the protest march would go to a remote location, about 10 km outside the city, rather than to the historic downtown area where the official FTAA summit were in a heavily guarded by thugs perimeter of private security services. These security services were paid with taxpayer money. "Instead of marching towards the perimeter fence and the Summit of the Americas meetings, march organizers chose a route march from the People's Summit through residential areas largely empty into the parking lot of a Stadium in a free zone several kilometers away. Henri Massé, President of the Federation des travailleurs et travailleuses du Québec (FTQ), explained: "I regret that we are so far from city center .... But it was a safety issue.

NGO leaders versus their compatriots

The establishment of the World Social Forum (WSF) in 2001 was undoubtedly a milestone, which brought together tens of thousands of committed activists. Was an important place that allowed the exchange of ideas and the establishment of ties of solidarity. What is at stake is the ambivalent role of the leaders of progressive organizations. His close relationship with the inner circles of power, funding by companies and government aid agencies, the World Bank, etc, undermines their relationships and responsibilities to their bases. The objective of "manufactured dissent" is just that: keep the leaders away from their bases as an effective means to silence and weaken popular actions. Most grassroots organizations participating in the World Social Forum, including farmers, workers and student organizations, firmly committed to the fight against neoliberalism were unaware of the relationship of the WSF International Council corporate financing, negotiated behind by a handful of leaders of NGOs related to official and private agencies funding. The funding of progressive organizations is not unconditional. His goal is to "pacify" and manipulate the protest movement. Precise conditions are set by funding agencies. If not met, the payments are discontinued. The FSM is defined as "an open meeting place for reflection, democratic debate of ideas, formulation of proposals, free exchange of experiences and networking for effective actions by groups and civil society movements that oppose neoliberalism and to domination of world corporate capitalism and any form of imperialism, and are committed to building a society centered in the human person. " (See

World Social Forum, accessed 2010).

The WSF is a patchwork of individual initiatives that do not directly threaten or challenge the legitimacy of global capitalism and its institutions. It meets annually. It is characterized by a multitude of sessions and workshops. In this sense, a feature of the WSF was to keep the model "do it yourself", typical of the donors funding the G-7 against the Village since the 1990's. This seemingly disorganized structure was presented and used deliberately. While favoring the debate on a number issues, the framework of the WSF is not conducive to the articulation of a common coherent platform and a plan of action to stop global capitalism. Moreover, the war launched by the U.S. Middle East and Central Asia that broke out just months after the inauguration of the headquarters of the WSF in Porto Alegre in January 2001, there has been a central topic in the forum discussions. What prevails is a vast and complex network of organizations. Grassroots organizations in developing countries are unaware that their partner NGOs in the United States or the European Union, which provide them financial support, are funded by large foundations. The money provides for restrictions in the actions of these movements. Many of these leaders of NGOs are engaged and well-intentioned people who act within a framework that sets the limits of dissent. The leaders of these movements are often co-opted, without even realizing that as a result of the financing of companies they are with their hands tied.

Global Capitalism funds the anti-capitalist movement: an absurd and contradictory relationship

"Another world is possible", but can not be achieved significant under this agreement. A reorganization of the World Social Forum, its organizational structure, funding mechanisms and leadership is necessary. There can be no mass movement that makes sense when dissent is generously funded by the same corporate interests that aim to limit and eliminate the protest movement. In the words of McGeorge Bundy, president of the Ford Foundation (1966-1979), "Everything that makes the Ford Foundation could be considered as mechanisms to make the world safe for corporate capitalism."

Monday, December 6, 2010

Lemon Juice To Cure Acid Reflux

The Lost Accents reach bookstores

... and the day arrived. Thanks to the efforts and dedication of Paul Zulaica, along with many more people-enhancers (the latter including the undersigned), editors, teachers, students, twitterers, editor and illustrator, has been able to release the book 'The Lost Accents' in the form of children's story.

the moment it is only in Mexico. But we will try to share the story with so many other enthusiasts from other latitudes. Thank

Paul to continue with the project forward with such enthusiasm and excitement! We are all Lost Accents.

Sunday, December 5, 2010

Where Do I Get My Abc Licence

ESA IMPOSTURE CALLED" SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT "

ESA
IMPOSTURE CALLED "SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT"

Klimaforum10, December 3, 2010

The development has been the keyword in the promotion and enforcement of U.S. economic interests since 1949, when it was used for the first time, the economic significance that we know. Parties, governments, banks, corporations, associations, NGOs have used this word for investments that promote, encourage, promote, such as dams, power plants, oil extraction, roads, ports, trains, school buildings, hospitals, towers, roads Fast, tunnels and other mega projects. In this particular activity has added a doctrine, a gospel, financiers and economists and big politicians: the "Human Development." However, the construction of these facilities and the promotion of economic growth that has accompanied it, has resulted in dire social and environmental situation in the world: Development actions have proved catastrophic for humanity, we are on the verge of environmental and social collapse because of development policies in the world promote the parties, governments and development banks. Development has fully confirmed its destructive nature for many years. The enormous capacity predatory Development was already well known since the 60's, as world governments in 1976 attempted to create a new "Development" means the "Eco", released in the Declaration of Cocoyoc, then, under pressure from Kissinger reportedly was promoted at the 80, a misleading concept that would wash the face of this pernicious activity: Sustainable Development, an oxymoron or contradiction of terms and a tautology: it is a contradictory concept in terms, since the development is unsustainable by its very nature . A tautology, then, the development has been defined for many years as a process that feeds back to maintain its own growth, is supposedly self-sustaining.

electric cars, light bulbs and refrigerators saving electricity, water treatment plants, "landfill", ecotourism, processes "sustainable" as the Sustainable Urban Development "and what is called" green technology " are part of "Sustainable Development". The doctrine of development is therefore a sham, a hoax, a fraud policy, with more destructive than crude oil development, without qualification, due to technological advances that now apply day, which provides greater social and environmental destruction in less time.

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT NO!

eCommunity, Ecological Network Autonomous of Mexico Basin.

- Miguel Valencia

eCommunity

Ecological Network Autonomous of Mexico Basin

descreces or Barbarism!

Immediate action against Peak Oil and Climate Change

Recent Texts

http://red-ecomunidades.blogspot.com/